On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 22:08 +0000, Sean Neakums wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 19:07 +0000, Sean Neakums wrote: > >> Sean Neakums <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > Both patches give me a successful sleep, although I had to alter the > >> > second to not #if 0 core99_ata100_enable -- there's another call to > >> > that function in pmac_feature.c's set_initial_features(). > >> > > >> > I will try to gather some power numbers. > >> > >> With the first patch, charge dropped by 33 over 52 minutes, 0.64/min. > >> With the second patch, charge dropped by 65 over 80 minutes, 0.81/min. > > > > Hi ! With the same initial charge ? The problem is that the drop isn't > > really linear... > > Oh, fiddlesticks, that didn't occur to me. I can redo with overnight > sleeps on a full charge, if you like.
Yes, I would appreciate, thanks. Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
