In case 1, it passes down the BLACK color from G to p and u, and maintains the
color of n. By doing so, it maintains the black height of the sub-tree.

While in the comment, it marks the color of n to BLACK. This is a typo and not
consistents with the code.

This patch fixs this typo in comment.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiy...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 lib/rbtree.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/rbtree.c b/lib/rbtree.c
index 65f4eff..c16c81a 100644
--- a/lib/rbtree.c
+++ b/lib/rbtree.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ __rb_insert(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_root *root,
                                 *      / \          / \
                                 *     p   u  -->   P   U
                                 *    /            /
-                                *   n            N
+                                *   n            n
                                 *
                                 * However, since g's parent might be red, and
                                 * 4) does not allow this, we need to recurse
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to