Hello, in the long thread on "[request for inclusion] Realtime LSM" there doesn't appear to be too many people who has actually tested the nice-and-rt-prio-rlimits.patch. Well, it works for me...
However, the patch to pam_limits posted here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/14/174 is a little bit aggressive on the semi-colon side. Tested patch (and pam.src.rpm for fedora c3) can be found here http://home.hia.no/~vegardl/rlimit/ and below --- Linux-PAM-0.77/modules/pam_limits/pam_limits.c.rtprio 2005-03-13 16:15:07.000000000 +0100 +++ Linux-PAM-0.77/modules/pam_limits/pam_limits.c 2005-03-13 16:27:54.000000000 +0100 @@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ #include <grp.h> #include <pwd.h> +/* Hack to test new rlimit values */ +#define RLIMIT_NICE 13 +#define RLIMIT_RTPRIO 14 +#define RLIM_NLIMITS 15 + /* Module defines */ #define LINE_LENGTH 1024 @@ -293,6 +298,10 @@ else if (strcmp(lim_item, "locks") == 0) limit_item = RLIMIT_LOCKS; #endif + else if (strcmp(lim_item, "rt_priority") == 0) + limit_item = RLIMIT_RTPRIO; + else if (strcmp(lim_item, "nice") == 0) + limit_item = RLIMIT_NICE; else if (strcmp(lim_item, "maxlogins") == 0) { limit_item = LIMIT_LOGIN; pl->flag_numsyslogins = 0; @@ -360,6 +369,18 @@ case RLIMIT_AS: limit_value *= 1024; break; + case RLIMIT_NICE: + if (limit_value > 39) + limit_value = 39; + if (limit_value < 0) + limit_value = 0; + break; + case RLIMIT_RTPRIO: + if (limit_value > 99) + limit_value = 99; + if (limit_value < 0) + limit_value = 0; + break; } if ( (limit_item != LIMIT_LOGIN) Thanks, -- Vegard Lima - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
