On 07/22/2014 11:30 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 01:04:02PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >> + node = cpu_to_node(cpumask_first(pool->attrs->cpumask)); > > Minor but maybe cpumask_any() is a better fit here? >
It is OK, the result are the same. But I still think cpumask_first() is better since its name sounds deterministic while we need a deterministic value for pool->node. Thanks, Lai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
