On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:24:15PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> When updating memcg VM statistics like PGFAULT we take the rcu read
> lock and lookup the memcg. For statistic updates this is overkill
> when the process may not belong to a memcg. This patch adds a light
> check to check if a memcg potentially exists. It's race-prone in that
> some VM stats may be missed when a process first joins a memcg but
> that is not serious enough to justify a constant performance penalty.

Tasks always belong to a memcg, the root group per default.  There
isn't really any accounting that could be omitted.

> The exact impact of this is difficult to quantify because it's timing
> sensitive, workload sensitive and sensitive to the RCU options set. However,
> broadly speaking there should be less interference due to page fault
> activity in both the number of RCU grace periods and their age.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index eb65d29..76fa97d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -220,6 +220,14 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_count_vm_event(struct 
> mm_struct *mm,
>  {
>       if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
>               return;
> +     /*
> +      * For statistic updates it's overkill to take the RCU lock and do
> +      * a fully safe lookup of an associated memcg. Do a simple check
> +      * first. At worst, we miss a few stat updates when a process is
> +      * moved to a memcg for the first time.
> +      */
> +     if (!rcu_access_pointer(mm->owner))
> +             return;

mm->owner is set when the mm is first initialized, it's only NULL
during race conditions on exit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to