Gu Zheng <guz.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:

> Previously, we only offer a single iovec to handle all the read/write cases, 
> so
> the PREADV/PWRITEV request always need to alloc more iovec buffer when copying
> user vectors.
> If we use a tmp iovec array rather than the single one, some small 
> PREADV/PWRITEV
> workloads(vector size small than the tmp buffer) will not need to alloc more
> iovec buffer when copying user vectors.

Hi, Gu,

This still doesn't explain why you decided to look into this.  Did you
notice a performance issue in this path?  Do you have benchmarks that
show some speedup due to this change?

Thanks,
Jeff

>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/aio.c |   10 +++++-----
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
> index f1fede2..df3491a 100644
> --- a/fs/aio.c
> +++ b/fs/aio.c
> @@ -1267,12 +1267,12 @@ static ssize_t aio_setup_vectored_rw(struct kiocb 
> *kiocb,
>       if (compat)
>               ret = compat_rw_copy_check_uvector(rw,
>                               (struct compat_iovec __user *)buf,
> -                             *nr_segs, 1, *iovec, iovec);
> +                             *nr_segs, UIO_FASTIOV, *iovec, iovec);
>       else
>  #endif
>               ret = rw_copy_check_uvector(rw,
>                               (struct iovec __user *)buf,
> -                             *nr_segs, 1, *iovec, iovec);
> +                             *nr_segs, UIO_FASTIOV, *iovec, iovec);
>       if (ret < 0)
>               return ret;
>  
> @@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ static ssize_t aio_run_iocb(struct kiocb *req, unsigned 
> opcode,
>       fmode_t mode;
>       aio_rw_op *rw_op;
>       rw_iter_op *iter_op;
> -     struct iovec inline_vec, *iovec = &inline_vec;
> +     struct iovec inline_vecs[UIO_FASTIOV], *iovec = inline_vecs;
>       struct iov_iter iter;
>  
>       switch (opcode) {
> @@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ rw_common:
>               if (!ret)
>                       ret = rw_verify_area(rw, file, &req->ki_pos, 
> req->ki_nbytes);
>               if (ret < 0) {
> -                     if (iovec != &inline_vec)
> +                     if (iovec != inline_vecs)
>                               kfree(iovec);
>                       return ret;
>               }
> @@ -1391,7 +1391,7 @@ rw_common:
>               return -EINVAL;
>       }
>  
> -     if (iovec != &inline_vec)
> +     if (iovec != inline_vecs)
>               kfree(iovec);
>  
>       if (ret != -EIOCBQUEUED) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to