On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:48:12PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > isolate_freepages_block() rechecks if the pageblock is suitable to be a target > for migration after it has taken the zone->lock. However, the check has been > optimized to occur only once per pageblock, and compact_checklock_irqsave() > might be dropping and reacquiring lock, which means somebody else might have > changed the pageblock's migratetype meanwhile. > > Furthermore, nothing prevents the migratetype to change right after > isolate_freepages_block() has finished isolating. Given how imperfect this is, > it's simpler to just rely on the check done in isolate_freepages() without > lock, and not pretend that the recheck under lock guarantees anything. It is > just a heuristic after all. > > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Zhang Yanfei <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Minchan Kim <[email protected]> > Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> > Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]> > Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <[email protected]> > Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> > Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> > Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
