On 2014-07-23 21:42, Tang Chen wrote:
> This patch only handle "L1 and L2 vm share one apic access page" situation.
> 
> When L1 vm is running, if the shared apic access page is migrated, 
> mmu_notifier will
> request all vcpus to exit to L0, and reload apic access page physical address 
> for
> all the vcpus' vmcs (which is done by patch 5/6). And when it enters L2 vm, 
> L2's vmcs
> will be updated in prepare_vmcs02() called by nested_vm_run(). So we need to 
> do
> nothing.
> 
> When L2 vm is running, if the shared apic access page is migrated, 
> mmu_notifier will
> request all vcpus to exit to L0, and reload apic access page physical address 
> for
> all L2 vmcs. And this patch requests apic access page reload in L2->L1 vmexit.

Shouldn't this patch come before we allow apic access page migration?

Jan


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to