On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Jon Smirl wrote: > All of the files in drivers/char/drm really should have an explicit > dual MIT/GPL license on them too. The DRM project has been taking > patches back into DRM from LKML without making it clear that DRM is > MIT licensed. It might be construed that doing this has made DRM GPL > without that being the intention.
They all have explicit MIT licenses on them, these files are only dual-licensed by the fact that they are shipped with the kernel, but they are MIT licensed and I would consider any changes to them to be MIT licensed unless someone explicitly states it.. Similiar to the reiser notice on top of those files.. I think MIT license is explicit enough... Some files are GPL licensed like drm_sysfs as it is obivously derived from GPL code, Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie Linux kernel - DRI, VAX / pam_smb / ILUG - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
