Hi White,
You've responded to one of my messages, but your mail server is also
sending bounce replies. You might want to contact your I.T. about this.
(I'll let you know if I ever stop getting bounces.)
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 01:00:01AM +0000, bpqw wrote:
> Do nand reset before write protect check
> If we want to check the WP# low or high through STATUS READ and check bit 7,
> we must reset the device, other operation (eg.erase/program a locked block)
> can
> also clear the bit 7 of status register.
This description doesn't really tell me why we need this patch.
First of all, where is the 'lock' sequence specified? I see the commit
that introduced nand_lock() (without any users) which says Micron parts
support it, but I don't see it documented in the datasheet:
commit 7d70f334ad2bf1b3aaa1f0699c0f442e14bcc9e0
Author: Vimal Singh <vimal.neww...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Feb 8 15:50:49 2010 +0530
mtd: nand: add lock/unlock routines
Now, supposing this is documented somewhere, are you seeing some kind of
out-of-spec behavior? Is this a controller quirk you're seeing? Why
should I need to reset the chip? I would presume that
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_STATUS, -1, -1);
would refresh the status properly. Is that not the case?
> Signed-off-by: White Ding <b...@micron.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index 41167e9..22dd3aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -965,6 +965,15 @@ int nand_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs,
> uint64_t len)
>
> chip->select_chip(mtd, chipnr);
>
> + /*
> + * Reset the chip.
> + * If we want to check the WP through READ STATUS and check the bit 7
> + * we must reset the chip
> + * some operation can also clear the bit 7 of status register
> + * eg. erase/program a locked block
> + */
> + chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RESET, -1, -1);
> +
> /* Check, if it is write protected */
> if (nand_check_wp(mtd)) {
> pr_debug("%s: device is write protected!\n",
> @@ -1015,6 +1024,15 @@ int nand_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs,
> uint64_t len)
>
> chip->select_chip(mtd, chipnr);
>
> + /*
> + * Reset the chip.
> + * If we want to check the WP through READ STATUS and check the bit 7
> + * we must reset the chip
> + * some operation can also clear the bit 7 of status register
> + * eg. erase/program a locked block
> + */
> + chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RESET, -1, -1);
> +
> /* Check, if it is write protected */
> if (nand_check_wp(mtd)) {
> pr_debug("%s: device is write protected!\n",
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
