When a CPU wakes up from idle and finds out that the timekeeper is
sleeping, we need to kick it such that it switches from dynticks to
periodic mode to maintain its timekeeping duty on behalf of the newly
awoken CPU.

However we aren't using the right API for that. rcu_kick_nohz_cpu() is
aimed at waking full dynticks CPUs and not the timekeeper.

Moreover the timekeeper must perform a new dynticks cycle to check the
new sysidle state and restart the tick if necessary. A simple call
to irq_exit() isn't enough.

wake_up_nohz_cpu() is a good fit for that job because it pulls the
target out of the idle loop and restart the tick. Then if no other
task waits for the CPU, it will reenter the idle loop and then the
new sysidle state will be visible and well handled.

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 551398b..477d81f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2494,7 +2494,7 @@ void rcu_sysidle_force_exit(void)
                                      oldstate, RCU_SYSIDLE_NOT);
                if (oldstate == newoldstate &&
                    oldstate == RCU_SYSIDLE_FULL_NOTED) {
-                       rcu_kick_nohz_cpu(tick_do_timer_cpu);
+                       wake_up_nohz_cpu(tick_do_timer_cpu);
                        return; /* We cleared it, done! */
                }
                oldstate = newoldstate;
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to