On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, Prarit Bhargava wrote:

> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> index 87fc96b..3875090 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> @@ -384,10 +384,10 @@ static void __init print_efi_memmap(void)
>            p < memmap.map_end;
>            p += memmap.desc_size, i++) {
>               md = p;
> -             pr_info("mem%02u: type=%u, attr=0x%llx, 
> range=[0x%016llx-0x%016llx) (%lluMB)\n",
> +             pr_info("mem%02u: type=%u, attr=0x%llx, 
> range=[0x%016llx-0x%016llx) (%lluKiB)\n",
>                       i, md->type, md->attribute, md->phys_addr,
>                       md->phys_addr + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT),
> -                     (md->num_pages >> (20 - EFI_PAGE_SHIFT)));
> +                     (md->num_pages << 2));
>       }
>  #endif  /*  EFI_DEBUG  */
>  }

If EFI_PAGE_SHIFT were to ever change from its hard-coded 12, then this 
would be wrong.  Any reason to not simply print EFI_PAGE_SIZE and 
md->num_pages?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to