On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:28:43PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:20:08PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > > > I'm curious what you mean. Are you referring to the fact that its input > > is simply an IRQ number (regardless of whether the IRQ is shared), not > > something that identifies the particular handler (e.g., struct > > irqaction)? > > Yes. I know that shared stuff is a massive head-ache, but I feel we > should not introduce primitives that do not work with it.
Thanks for the reply. I could also have just read the rest of the thread [1], in which this very question was addressed already. Shame on me. Brian [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/28/60 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/