On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:

> >
> > +#ifndef ____cacheline_pad_in_smp
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> > +#define ____cacheline_pad_in_smp struct { char  x; } 
> > ____cacheline_maxaligned_in_smp
>                                              ^^^^^^^
>
> Doesn't this add a redundant cacheline if the padding is
> previously perfect? Because of the extra byte you're adding?
>
> IIRC, the char x[0]; trick does the job correctly.

Good idea.

This patch removes the zone padding hack and establishes definitions
in include/linux/cache.h to define the padding within struct zone.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Shai Fultheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Index: linux-2.6.11/include/linux/cache.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.11.orig/include/linux/cache.h     2005-03-08 18:40:15.000000000 
-0800
+++ linux-2.6.11/include/linux/cache.h  2005-03-14 10:33:45.247701040 -0800
@@ -48,4 +48,12 @@
 #endif
 #endif

+#ifndef ____cacheline_pad_in_smp
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
+#define ____cacheline_pad_in_smp struct { char  x[0]; } 
____cacheline_maxaligned_in_smp
+#else
+#define ____cacheline_pad_in_smp
+#endif
+#endif
+
 #endif /* __LINUX_CACHE_H */
Index: linux-2.6.11/include/linux/mmzone.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.11.orig/include/linux/mmzone.h    2005-03-14 10:33:01.037422024 
-0800
+++ linux-2.6.11/include/linux/mmzone.h 2005-03-14 10:33:45.248700888 -0800
@@ -28,21 +28,6 @@ struct free_area {

 struct pglist_data;

-/*
- * zone->lock and zone->lru_lock are two of the hottest locks in the kernel.
- * So add a wild amount of padding here to ensure that they fall into separate
- * cachelines.  There are very few zone structures in the machine, so space
- * consumption is not a concern here.
- */
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
-struct zone_padding {
-       char x[0];
-} ____cacheline_maxaligned_in_smp;
-#define ZONE_PADDING(name)     struct zone_padding name;
-#else
-#define ZONE_PADDING(name)
-#endif
-
 struct per_cpu_pages {
        int count;              /* number of pages in the list */
        int low;                /* low watermark, refill needed */
@@ -131,7 +116,14 @@ struct zone {
        struct free_area        free_area[MAX_ORDER];


-       ZONE_PADDING(_pad1_)
+       /*
+        * zone->lock and zone->lru_lock are two of the hottest locks in the 
kernel.
+        * So add a wild amount of padding here to ensure that they fall into 
separate
+        * cachelines.  There are very few zone structures in the machine, so 
space
+        * consumption is not a concern here.
+        */
+
+       ____cacheline_pad_in_smp;

        /* Fields commonly accessed by the page reclaim scanner */
        spinlock_t              lru_lock;
@@ -164,7 +156,7 @@ struct zone {
        int prev_priority;


-       ZONE_PADDING(_pad2_)
+       ____cacheline_pad_in_smp;
        /* Rarely used or read-mostly fields */

        /*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to