On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:39:37PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> This commit adds torture tests for RCU-tasks.  It also fixes a bug that
> would segfault for an RCU flavor lacking a callback-barrier function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Seems reasonable; however, you could also set .cb_barrier =
synchronize_rcu_tasks and drop rcu_barrier_tasks.

Either way:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org>

>  include/linux/rcupdate.h |  1 +
>  kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c  | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 17c7e25c38be..ecb2198849e0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ enum rcutorture_type {
>       RCU_FLAVOR,
>       RCU_BH_FLAVOR,
>       RCU_SCHED_FLAVOR,
> +     RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR,
>       SRCU_FLAVOR,
>       INVALID_RCU_FLAVOR
>  };
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> index febe07062ac5..6d12ab6675bc 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> @@ -602,6 +602,42 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops sched_ops = {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> + * Definitions for RCU-tasks torture testing.
> + */
> +
> +static int tasks_torture_read_lock(void)
> +{
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void tasks_torture_read_unlock(int idx)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static void rcu_tasks_torture_deferred_free(struct rcu_torture *p)
> +{
> +     call_rcu_tasks(&p->rtort_rcu, rcu_torture_cb);
> +}
> +
> +static struct rcu_torture_ops tasks_ops = {
> +     .ttype          = RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR,
> +     .init           = rcu_sync_torture_init,
> +     .readlock       = tasks_torture_read_lock,
> +     .read_delay     = rcu_read_delay,  /* just reuse rcu's version. */
> +     .readunlock     = tasks_torture_read_unlock,
> +     .completed      = rcu_no_completed,
> +     .deferred_free  = rcu_tasks_torture_deferred_free,
> +     .sync           = synchronize_rcu_tasks,
> +     .exp_sync       = synchronize_rcu_tasks,
> +     .call           = call_rcu_tasks,
> +     .cb_barrier     = rcu_barrier_tasks,
> +     .fqs            = NULL,
> +     .stats          = NULL,
> +     .irq_capable    = 1,
> +     .name           = "tasks"
> +};
> +
> +/*
>   * RCU torture priority-boost testing.  Runs one real-time thread per
>   * CPU for moderate bursts, repeatedly registering RCU callbacks and
>   * spinning waiting for them to be invoked.  If a given callback takes
> @@ -1295,7 +1331,8 @@ static int rcu_torture_barrier_cbs(void *arg)
>               if (atomic_dec_and_test(&barrier_cbs_count))
>                       wake_up(&barrier_wq);
>       } while (!torture_must_stop());
> -     cur_ops->cb_barrier();
> +     if (cur_ops->cb_barrier != NULL)
> +             cur_ops->cb_barrier();
>       destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rcu);
>       torture_kthread_stopping("rcu_torture_barrier_cbs");
>       return 0;
> @@ -1534,6 +1571,7 @@ rcu_torture_init(void)
>       int firsterr = 0;
>       static struct rcu_torture_ops *torture_ops[] = {
>               &rcu_ops, &rcu_bh_ops, &rcu_busted_ops, &srcu_ops, &sched_ops,
> +             &tasks_ops,
>       };
>  
>       if (!torture_init_begin(torture_type, verbose, &rcutorture_runnable))
> -- 
> 1.8.1.5
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to