Bill Davidsen wrote:

Matt Mackall wrote:

In your world, do you want to do:

cp -rl linux-2.6.11 linux-2.6.11.5
cd linux-2.6.11.5
bzcat ../Patches/patch-2.6.11.1.bz2 | patch -p1
bzcat ../Patches/patch-2.6.11.2.bz2 | patch -p1
bzcat ../Patches/patch-2.6.11.3.bz2 | patch -p1
bzcat ../Patches/patch-2.6.11.4.bz2 | patch -p1
bzcat ../Patches/patch-2.6.11.5.bz2 | patch -p1

I suspect you might find that tedious, especially if only the last one
addressed a bug that affected you.


Being lazy, I would do
bzcat ../Patches/patch-2.6.11.*.bz | patch -p1
(or similar). But as I posted long ago when this discussion started it is desirable to have both.


being super lazy I'd type:
scripts/patch-kernel . ../Patches

nb it's currently broke as mentioned in another thread:
Re: [BUG] Re: [PATCH] scripts/patch-kernel: use EXTRAVERSION
being fixed though. It will (I assume!) embody whatever rules are needed to revoke patches to go from 2.6.11.5 to 2.6.12 (and since I think the new version has d/l facilities, that should assist in the case of a base kernel d/l of 2.6.11.3 for which no local patches exist to revert prior to patching to 2.6.12)


David


- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to