Hello Andreas, On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Andreas Färber <[email protected]> wrote: > Specification and existing device trees use vsys-l{1,2}-supply, > not vsys_l{1,2}-supply. Fix the example to match the specification. > > Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> > Fixes: 21d2202158e9 ("mfd: tps65090: add DT support for tps65090") > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <[email protected]> > --- > v2 -> v3: > * Added Fixes header > * + regulator and mfd maintainers > > v1 -> v2: > * More verbose commit message (requested by Mark Rutland) > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt > index 340980239ea9..ca69f5e3040c 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/tps65090.txt > @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ Example: > infet5-supply = <&some_reg>; > infet6-supply = <&some_reg>; > infet7-supply = <&some_reg>; > - vsys_l1-supply = <&some_reg>; > - vsys_l2-supply = <&some_reg>; > + vsys-l1-supply = <&some_reg>; > + vsys-l2-supply = <&some_reg>; >
True, these also matches the .supply_name used when registering the LDO[1-2] regulators in the tps65090 driver. So clearly the example was wrong while the property specification is correct. Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]> Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
