On Sun, 03 Aug 2014 17:12:57 +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> On 08/03/2014 04:12 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> >> + (verbose > 0 && level >= 0)) {
> >> + print_temp("CPU-temp: ", temp );
> >> + if (casetemp)
> >> + print_temp(", Case: ", casetemp );
> >> + if (level >= 0)
> >> + printk(", Fan: %d (tuned %+d)\n", 11-level,
> >> + x.fan_level-level );
> >> + else
> >> + printk(", Fan: %d (tuned +0)\n",x.fan_level);
> >
> > I think you can do without the "tuned +0" which doesn't add much value.
>
> Me too. But the old driver does the same, so I preferred to
> leave it as is.
I looked at the code again and no, I can't see the old code doing that.
It has "tuned %+d" only in tune_fan() which is only called if
level >= 0. The other printk (when tune_fan isn't called) doesn't have
a "tuned" part.
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
