On 05/08/14 09:44, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > > Monday, August 4, 2014, 8:43:18 PM, you wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 04:30:05PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote: >>> On 14/07/14 17:18, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>> Greg: goto GHK >>>> >>>> This is v5 version of patches to fix some issues in Xen PCIback. >>> >>> Applied to devel/for-linus-3.17. > >> Thank you. >>> >>> I dropped the stable Cc for #2 pending a final decision on whether it >>> really is a stable candidate. > >> OK. >>> >>> David > > Hi Konrad / David, > > This series still lacks a resolution on the sysfs /do_flr /reset, > as a result the pci devices are not reset after shutdown of a guest. > (no more pciback 0000:xx:xx.x: restoring config space at offset xxx) > > So this series now introduces a regression to 3.16, which causes devices to > malfunction > after a guest reboot or after assigning the devices to another guest.
I don't follow what you're saying. The lack of a device reset for PCI devices with no FLR method isn't a regression as this has never worked. Can you explain in more detail what the regression is and which patch caused it? > Apart from that .. i can't resist to remind the other issue with removing pci > devices passed through to HVM guests related to the signaling via xenstore, > described in: > > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-07/msg01875.html I don't remember seeing you posting a patch...? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
