op 05-08-14 16:41, Peter Zijlstra schreef: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 08:07:28AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Maybe I wasn't clear; but I meant you should extend the lock tests to >>> cover the full qrwlock semantics. >>> >>> That means we also need tests like: >>> >>> RL(X1); >>> IRQ_ENTER(); >>> RL(X2); >>> IRQ_EXIT(); >>> >>> To fully validate that in_interrupt exception to fairness etc.. >> A bit off topic for this patch, however relevant for tests in general. >> Is there a reason why these locking selftests need to be under lib? >> Can they be consolidated under tools/testing/selftests? > tools/ seems wrong as its very much not userspace. Could be moved to kernel/locking though now that all other locking moved there. :-)
~Maarten -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
