On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 03:15 +0800, Yuyang Du wrote: > Hi Jason, > > I am not sure whether you noticed my latest work: rewriting per entity load > average > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1760754 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1760755 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1760757 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1760756 > > which simply does not track blocked load average at all. Are you interested in > testing the patchset with the workload you have?
Hi Yuyang, yes I can also test your latest patchset with some of the AIM7 workloads. Not needing extra overhead for the blocked load should also address this contention in update_cfs_rq_blocked_load(). > The comparison can also help > us understand the rewrite. Overall, per our tests, the overhead should be > less, > and perf should be better. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
