> Sigh, that's d84153d6c96f61a so that's been there a while, and been
> broken equally long.
> 
> So this is where we run a low period (!freq) hardware event on a
> nohz_full cpu or so? And because it throttles, we need to kick the tick
> into action to unthrottle it.
> 
> I suppose there's a good reason I never build with that nohz_full
> nonsense enabled :/
> 
> Not sure how we should go fix that, you can't just issue random IPIs
> from NMI context.

OK, thinking one more second would've done it, how about so?

---
 include/linux/perf_event.h | 7 ++++---
 kernel/events/core.c       | 8 +++++++-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 707617a8c0f6..177411e3ffc4 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -421,9 +421,10 @@ struct perf_event {
        struct fasync_struct            *fasync;
 
        /* delayed work for NMIs and such */
-       int                             pending_wakeup;
-       int                             pending_kill;
-       int                             pending_disable;
+       int                             pending_kill      : 16;
+       int                             pending_wakeup    : 1;
+       int                             pending_disable   : 1;
+       int                             pending_nohz_kick : 1;
        struct irq_work                 pending;
 
        atomic_t                        event_limit;
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 1cf24b3e42ec..e95fca20e26f 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4258,6 +4258,11 @@ static void perf_pending_event(struct irq_work *entry)
                event->pending_wakeup = 0;
                perf_event_wakeup(event);
        }
+
+       if (event->pending_nohz_kick) {
+               event->pending_nohz_kick = 0;
+               tick_nohz_full_kick();
+       }
 }
 
 /*
@@ -5431,7 +5436,8 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
                        __this_cpu_inc(perf_throttled_count);
                        hwc->interrupts = MAX_INTERRUPTS;
                        perf_log_throttle(event, 0);
-                       tick_nohz_full_kick();
+                       event->pending_nohz_kick = 1;
+                       irq_work_queue(&event->pending);
                        ret = 1;
                }
        }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to