On Sun, 2014-08-10 at 05:13 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 20:04 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > NAK. There it is, my imaginary NAK to imaginary realtime priorities :) > > > > Ok, but do you have any alternative proposal yourself how to solve the > > lockholder preemption problem? I assume you agree it's a real problem. > > > > Just being negative is not very constructive. > > I both acknowledged the problem problem, and made alternative > suggestions.
Note who I replied to https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/28/77 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
