Hi Brian, On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Brian Norris <computersforpe...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm curious: do your broken compilers also generate broken code/data? > i.e., does gcc 4.4.7 give 250000000000 its proper ULL value still?
Yes it does (checked the assembler output). >> > However, I could be convinced to apply this, if only to satisfy broken >> > tools and to avoid addressing this question over and over... >> >> So please apply. Too many people are still using 32-bit targets and >> gcc < 4.6. > > OK, you've convinced me ;) Applied to l2-mtd.git/next, with an editorial > comment. Thanks! BTW, I had some faint memories of integer constants never being 64-bit without the "LL" suffix, but that's no longer true in c99 (I did check that a few days ago). The warning does go away when adding -std=c99 with gcc-4.4. Interestingly, it doesn't appear with -std=c89 with gcc 4.6.2 or 4.8.2. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/