On 8/12/2014 9:12 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:42 PM, Stepan Moskovchenko <step...@codeaurora.org> wrote:When we parse the device tree and allocate platform devices, the 'name' of the newly-created platform_device is set to point to the 'name' field of the 'struct device' embedded within the platform_device. This is dangerous, because the name of the 'struct device' is dynamically allocated. Drivers may call dev_set_name() on the device, which will free and reallocate the name of the device, leaving the 'name' of the platform_device pointing to the now-freed memory. Furthermore, if the dev_set_name() call is made from a driver's probe() function and a subsequent request results in probe deferral, the dangling 'name' reference may lead to the device being re-probed using the wrong driver. To mitigate these scenarios, we use kstrdup to perform a deep copy of the device name when assigning the name of the platform_device, so that the platform_device name is unaffected by any calls to dev_set_name() that might made by drivers to rename the embedded 'struct device'. Signed-off-by: Stepan Moskovchenko <step...@codeaurora.org> --- I suppose creating a 'pdev_set_name' API may seem like another possibility, but I feel that dev.name and pdev.name have two different meanings. One is used for device/driver binding purposes, whereas the other serves a more general identification purpose, and is used for things like sysfs. Drivers might want to change dev.name while leaving the pdev.name alone. I guess yet another possibility would be to prohibit calling dev_set_name() on devices created from device tree, but a driver does not necessarily know how a given platform_device was allocated. drivers/of/device.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c index f685e55..fe5f025 100644 --- a/drivers/of/device.c +++ b/drivers/of/device.c @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ int of_device_add(struct platform_device *ofdev) /* name and id have to be set so that the platform bus doesn't get * confused on matching */ - ofdev->name = dev_name(&ofdev->dev); + ofdev->name = kstrdup(dev_name(&ofdev->dev), GFP_KERNEL); ofdev->id = -1; /* device_add will assume that this device is on the same node asDon’t we need to free this is of_device_unregister() now? - k
Argh. I was confused by the asymmetric naming of the APIs, but after digging through the callers outside from drivers/of/, it looks like things do eventually filter down to of_device_add() in all the cases I could find. So yes, this does need to be fixed. Expect v2 soon.
Thanks Steve -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
