Commit-ID: aa9fc0c19bee0cbc152e0e06488095fb69229236 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/aa9fc0c19bee0cbc152e0e06488095fb69229236 Author: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> AuthorDate: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:41:52 -0700 Committer: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> CommitDate: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:32:00 +0200
locking/mcs: Remove obsolete comment ... as we clearly inline mcs_spin_lock() now. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jason Low <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> --- kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h index 23e89c5..4d60986 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h +++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h @@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ do { \ * If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin * on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked * in mcs_spin_unlock(). - * - * We don't inline mcs_spin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the - * time spent in this lock function. */ static inline void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
