Hi,
I have a piece of code as shown below.
#######################
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h
b/arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h
index 9a8fd84..86be4f9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ extern void cpu_cache_off(void);
extern void cpu_do_idle(void);
extern void cpu_do_switch_mm(unsigned long pgd_phys, struct mm_struct *mm);
extern void cpu_reset(unsigned long addr) __attribute__((noreturn));
+extern void cpu_soft_restart(phys_addr_t cpu_reset,
unsigned long addr) __attribute__((noreturn));
extern void cpu_do_suspend(struct cpu_suspend_ctx *ptr);
extern u64 cpu_do_resume(phys_addr_t ptr, u64 idmap_ttbr);
########################
Other lines had an "extern" in them I also added it blindly.
when the above code is given checkpatch.pl did not throw any
error/warning,; but I got this reply
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-August/279691.html
[[As the functions have external linkage by default, the extern keyword is
irrelevant in this case.]]
Does checkpatch.pl misbehave in my case?
--Arun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
