Dne 13.8.2014 10:03, Geert Uytterhoeven napsal(a): > CC kbuild > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Chen Gang <gang.chen.5...@gmail.com> wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> index c49a775..0510a5d 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> @@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ config NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE >> config ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES >> def_bool y >> >> +config CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN >> + depends on !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN >> + def_bool y >> + >> + >> config ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_COHERENT_MASK >> bool > > As this is a common symbol, and replicated for all affected architectures, > I'm wondering if we should have the "config CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN" in > common Kconfig code instead, and make the individual architectures do a > "select CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN"?
Yes! > Also we could have "config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN", too, and error out > if none or both are selected (can Kconfig error out?). We can error out in the Makefile, if there is consensus that we should be doing so. Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
