The uses of "rcu_assign_pointer()" are NULLing out the pointers.
According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment:
"1. This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer"
it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a
smaller overhead.
The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
@@
@@
- rcu_assign_pointer
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER
(..., NULL)
Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat....@gmail.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
index 759d5e0..4dc8b79 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static void unreg_event_syscall_enter(struct
ftrace_event_file *file,
return;
mutex_lock(&syscall_trace_lock);
tr->sys_refcount_enter--;
- rcu_assign_pointer(tr->enter_syscall_files[num], NULL);
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(tr->enter_syscall_files[num], NULL);
if (!tr->sys_refcount_enter)
unregister_trace_sys_enter(ftrace_syscall_enter, tr);
mutex_unlock(&syscall_trace_lock);
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static void unreg_event_syscall_exit(struct
ftrace_event_file *file,
return;
mutex_lock(&syscall_trace_lock);
tr->sys_refcount_exit--;
- rcu_assign_pointer(tr->exit_syscall_files[num], NULL);
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(tr->exit_syscall_files[num], NULL);
if (!tr->sys_refcount_exit)
unregister_trace_sys_exit(ftrace_syscall_exit, tr);
mutex_unlock(&syscall_trace_lock);
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
