On 08/22/2014 10:16 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 17:08 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >> > But this is just for current process. We want to determine whether or >> > not it was worth to loop busily in current process by checking if >> > there's any another runnable processes or callbacks. And what we need >> > here is just a simple and lockless hint which can't be wrong but may be >> > inaccurate to exit the busy loop. The net code does not depends on this >> > hint to do scheduling or yielding. >> > >> > How about just introducing a boolean helper like current_can_busy_loop() >> > and return true in one of the following conditions: >> > >> > - Current task is SCHED_FIFO >> > - Current task is neither SCHED_FIFO nor SCHED_IDLE and no other >> > runnable processes or pending RCU callbacks in current cpu >> > >> > And add warns to make sure it can only be called in process context. > 1) Any reasons Eliezer Tamir is not included in the CC list ? > > He is the busypoll author after all, and did nothing wrong to be > banned from these patches ;) CC Eliezer Tamir
No intentional, I just generate the CC list through get_maintainer.pl :( > > 2) It looks like sk_buy_loop() should not be inlined, its is already too > big. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/