On 08/26/14 11:46, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:25:21AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Fri, 22 Aug 2014, Mark Brown wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 05:30:56PM +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle >>> (Essensium/Mind) wrote: >>>> From http://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/SWCZ010 : >>>> >>>> Glitch on SDA-SCL not managed correctly by the I2C IP > >> drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >>> Applied, thanks. > >> Eh? > > So, this is an example of why it's important to both use subject lines > matching the pattern for the subsystem and try to select CC lists > sensibly. I've dropped the patch.
So, what is the proper subsystem in this case? mfd? Should I repost with the subsystem in the subject? BTW, while I'm asking questions: is this something that should be sent to stable? Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
