Hey Greg,

Can you add these two patches to the 3.16 queue?

Thanks,

On (Tue) 12 Aug 2014 [13:23:45], Amit Shah wrote:
> Instead of calling hwrng_register() in the probe routing, call it in the
> scan routine.  This ensures that when hwrng_register() is successful,
> and it requests a few random bytes to seed the kernel's pool at init,
> we're ready to service that request.
> 
> This will also enable us to remove the workaround added previously to
> check whether probe was completed, and only then ask for data from the
> host.  The revert follows in the next commit.
> 
> There's a slight behaviour change here on unsuccessful hwrng_register().
> Previously, when hwrng_register() failed, the probe() routine would
> fail, and the vqs would be torn down, and driver would be marked not
> initialized.  Now, the vqs will remain initialized, driver would be
> marked initialized as well, but won't be available in the list of RNGs
> available to hwrng core.  To fix the failures, the procedure remains the
> same, i.e. unload and re-load the module, and hope things succeed the
> next time around.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au>
> (cherry picked from commit 5c06273401f2eb7b290cadbae18ee00f8f65e893)
> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c 
> b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> index e9b15bc..f4e04f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct virtrng_info {
>       bool busy;
>       char name[25];
>       int index;
> +     bool hwrng_register_done;
>  };
>  
>  static bool probe_done;
> @@ -137,15 +138,6 @@ static int probe_common(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>               return err;
>       }
>  
> -     err = hwrng_register(&vi->hwrng);
> -     if (err) {
> -             vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> -             vi->vq = NULL;
> -             kfree(vi);
> -             ida_simple_remove(&rng_index_ida, index);
> -             return err;
> -     }
> -
>       probe_done = true;
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -153,9 +145,11 @@ static int probe_common(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  static void remove_common(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  {
>       struct virtrng_info *vi = vdev->priv;
> +
>       vdev->config->reset(vdev);
>       vi->busy = false;
> -     hwrng_unregister(&vi->hwrng);
> +     if (vi->hwrng_register_done)
> +             hwrng_unregister(&vi->hwrng);
>       vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
>       ida_simple_remove(&rng_index_ida, vi->index);
>       kfree(vi);
> @@ -171,6 +165,16 @@ static void virtrng_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>       remove_common(vdev);
>  }
>  
> +static void virtrng_scan(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> +     struct virtrng_info *vi = vdev->priv;
> +     int err;
> +
> +     err = hwrng_register(&vi->hwrng);
> +     if (!err)
> +             vi->hwrng_register_done = true;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>  static int virtrng_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  {
> @@ -195,6 +199,7 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_rng_driver = {
>       .id_table =     id_table,
>       .probe =        virtrng_probe,
>       .remove =       virtrng_remove,
> +     .scan =         virtrng_scan,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>       .freeze =       virtrng_freeze,
>       .restore =      virtrng_restore,
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 

                Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to