On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:13:50AM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
>> >> Yes, this patch helps my case as well. > > Very good!!! > > Pranith, I can take this patch, but would you be willing to invert > the sense of ->nocb_leader_wake (e.g., call it ->nocb_leader_sleep or > some such)? This field is only used in eight places in the source code. > > The idea is that inverting the sense of the field allows the normal C > initialization of zero to properly initialize this field, plus it gets > rid of a few lines of code. > Sure, that is indeed a good idea. I will send a new patch. -- Pranith -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
