Hi! [I'm not sure if I should further feed the trolls.]
> >Yes, it *is* rather unfair. Sorry about that. But having 2 different > >limited compressed filesystems in kernel does not seem good to me. > what do you need e.g. reiserfs 4 for? or jfs? or xfs? does not ext2/3 > the journalling job also? > is there really a need for cifs and samba and ncpfs and nfs v3 and nfs > v4? why? Take a look at debate that preceded xfs merge. And btw reiserfs4 is *not* merged. And people merging xfs/reiserfs4/etc did address problems pointed out in their code. Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/