Hi Andrzej,

On 08/28/2014 06:07 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Process should not have access to ipp nodes created by another
> process. The patch adds necessary checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.ha...@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c
> index fc8bb67..d233cfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c
> @@ -318,7 +318,8 @@ static void ipp_print_property(struct 
> drm_exynos_ipp_property *property,
>               sz->hsize, sz->vsize, config->flip, config->degree);
>  }
>  
> -static int ipp_find_and_set_property(struct drm_exynos_ipp_property 
> *property)
> +static int ipp_find_and_set_property(struct drm_exynos_ipp_property 
> *property,
> +             struct drm_file *file)

This is ok, but i think ipp_find_and_set_property function is some
duplicated. If we add function to get c_node from struct
exynos_drm_ippdrv, it's easy to remove ipp_find_and_set_property.

Thanks.

>  {
>       struct exynos_drm_ippdrv *ippdrv;
>       struct drm_exynos_ipp_cmd_node *c_node;
> @@ -339,8 +340,12 @@ static int ipp_find_and_set_property(struct 
> drm_exynos_ipp_property *property)
>        */
>       mutex_lock(&ippdrv->cmd_lock);
>       list_for_each_entry(c_node, &ippdrv->cmd_list, list) {
> -             if ((c_node->property.prop_id == prop_id) &&
> -                 (c_node->state == IPP_STATE_STOP)) {
> +             if (c_node->property.prop_id == prop_id) {
> +                     if (c_node->filp != file)
> +                             break;
> +                     if (c_node->state != IPP_STATE_STOP)
> +                             break;
> +
>                       mutex_unlock(&ippdrv->cmd_lock);
>                       DRM_DEBUG_KMS("found cmd[%d]ippdrv[0x%x]\n",
>                               property->cmd, (int)ippdrv);
> @@ -418,7 +423,7 @@ int exynos_drm_ipp_set_property(struct drm_device 
> *drm_dev, void *data,
>        */
>       if (property->prop_id) {
>               DRM_DEBUG_KMS("prop_id[%d]\n", property->prop_id);
> -             return ipp_find_and_set_property(property);
> +             return ipp_find_and_set_property(property, file);
>       }
>  
>       /* find ipp driver using ipp id */
> @@ -1032,7 +1037,7 @@ int exynos_drm_ipp_cmd_ctrl(struct drm_device *drm_dev, 
> void *data,
>  
>       c_node = ipp_find_obj(&ctx->prop_idr, &ctx->prop_lock,
>               cmd_ctrl->prop_id);
> -     if (!c_node) {
> +     if (!c_node || c_node->filp != file) {
>               DRM_ERROR("invalid command node list.\n");
>               return -ENODEV;
>       }
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to