From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rus...@intel.com>
Resolve a missing-field-initializer warning, that is produced
by every reference to module_param_call, by using designated
initialization for the first field. That is enough to silence
the complaint.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rus...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
---
include/linux/moduleparam.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/moduleparam.h b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
index 494f99e..d99a9e9 100644
--- a/include/linux/moduleparam.h
+++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ struct kparam_array
/* Obsolete - use module_param_cb() */
#define module_param_call(name, set, get, arg, perm) \
static struct kernel_param_ops __param_ops_##name = \
- { 0, (void *)set, (void *)get }; \
+ { .flags = 0, (void *)set, (void *)get }; \
__module_param_call(MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX, \
name, &__param_ops_##name, arg, \
(perm) + sizeof(__check_old_set_param(set))*0, -1)
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
