On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:32:10 +1100 Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think David's on the right track - I think there's something a > bit wrong at the top. In my reply to Andrew in this thread I > posted a patch which may at least get things working... We have to do the "if (ceiling)" check in every spot where we mask it in some way, and if it falls to zero from non-zero due to the masking, we skip. That gives me a mostly working kernel. Bad news is that while lat_proc's fork and exec tests improve dramatically, shell performance is way down on sparc64. I'll post before and after numbers in a bit. Note, this is just with Hugh's base patch plus bug fixes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/