On Wed, Mar 23 2005, Tejun Heo wrote:
>  Hi,
> 
> James Bottomley wrote:
> >On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 11:14 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> >>    When hot-unplugging using scsi_remove_host() function (as usb
> >>    does), scsi_forget_host() used to be called before
> >>    scsi_host_cancel().  So, the device gets removed first without
> >>    request cleanup and scsi_host_cancel() never gets to call
> >>    scsi_device_cancel() on the removed devices.  This results in
> >>    premature completion of hot-unplugging process with active
> >>    requests left in queue, eventually leading to hang/offlined
> >>    device or oops when the active command times out.
> >>
> >>    This patch makes scsi_remove_host() call scsi_host_cancel()
> >>    first such that the host is first transited into cancel state
> >>    and all requests of all devices are killed, and then, the
> >>    devices are removed.  This patch fixes the oops in eh after
> >>    hot-unplugging bug.
> >
> >
> >This is actually simply reversing this patch:
> >
> >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=109268755500248
> >
> >And all it does is give us the previous consequences back.
> >
> >The oops isn't in the eh it's in the usb-storage eh routine.
> 
>  Well, but it's because scsi midlayer calls back into usb-storage eh 
> after the detaching process is complete.
> 
> >However, the current host code does need fixing, but the fix is to move
> >it over to a proper state model rather than the current bit twiddling we
> >do.
> 
>  I agree & am working on it.  This patch was mainly to verify Jens' oops.

It is not the oops I am getting. When I get a few minutes today, I'll
reproduce with vanilla and post it here.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to