On Thu 04-09-14 11:08:46, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
> From 6fa7599054868cd0df940d7b0973dd64f8acb0b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 10:04:34 -0400
> Subject: [patch] mm: memcontrol: revert use of root_mem_cgroup res_counter
> 
> Dave Hansen reports a massive scalability regression in an uncontained
> page fault benchmark with more than 30 concurrent threads, which he
> bisected down to 05b843012335 ("mm: memcontrol: use root_mem_cgroup
> res_counter") and pin-pointed on res_counter spinlock contention.
> 
> That change relied on the per-cpu charge caches to mostly swallow the
> res_counter costs, but it's apparent that the caches don't scale yet.
> 
> Revert memcg back to bypassing res_counters on the root level in order
> to restore performance for uncontained workloads.
> 
> Reported-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>

The revert looks good to me.
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 103 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index ec4dcf1b9562..085dc6d2f876 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2534,6 +2534,8 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t 
> gfp_mask,
>       unsigned long long size;
>       int ret = 0;
>  
> +     if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> +             goto done;
>  retry:
>       if (consume_stock(memcg, nr_pages))
>               goto done;
> @@ -2611,9 +2613,7 @@ nomem:
>       if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  bypass:
> -     memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
> -     ret = -EINTR;
> -     goto retry;
> +     return -EINTR;
>  
>  done_restock:
>       if (batch > nr_pages)
> @@ -2626,6 +2626,9 @@ static void cancel_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, 
> unsigned int nr_pages)
>  {
>       unsigned long bytes = nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
>  
> +     if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> +             return;
> +
>       res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->res, bytes);
>       if (do_swap_account)
>               res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, bytes);
> @@ -2640,6 +2643,9 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_cancel_local_charge(struct 
> mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  {
>       unsigned long bytes = nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
>  
> +     if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> +             return;
> +
>       res_counter_uncharge_until(&memcg->res, memcg->res.parent, bytes);
>       if (do_swap_account)
>               res_counter_uncharge_until(&memcg->memsw,
> @@ -4093,6 +4099,46 @@ out:
>       return retval;
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long mem_cgroup_recursive_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +                                            enum mem_cgroup_stat_index idx)
> +{
> +     struct mem_cgroup *iter;
> +     long val = 0;
> +
> +     /* Per-cpu values can be negative, use a signed accumulator */
> +     for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg)
> +             val += mem_cgroup_read_stat(iter, idx);
> +
> +     if (val < 0) /* race ? */
> +             val = 0;
> +     return val;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u64 mem_cgroup_usage(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool swap)
> +{
> +     u64 val;
> +
> +     if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) {
> +             if (!swap)
> +                     return res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE);
> +             else
> +                     return res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
> +     }
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Transparent hugepages are still accounted for in MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS
> +      * as well as in MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS_HUGE.
> +      */
> +     val = mem_cgroup_recursive_stat(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_CACHE);
> +     val += mem_cgroup_recursive_stat(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS);
> +
> +     if (swap)
> +             val += mem_cgroup_recursive_stat(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAP);
> +
> +     return val << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +}
> +
> +
>  static u64 mem_cgroup_read_u64(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
>                              struct cftype *cft)
>  {
> @@ -4102,8 +4148,12 @@ static u64 mem_cgroup_read_u64(struct 
> cgroup_subsys_state *css,
>  
>       switch (type) {
>       case _MEM:
> +             if (name == RES_USAGE)
> +                     return mem_cgroup_usage(memcg, false);
>               return res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, name);
>       case _MEMSWAP:
> +             if (name == RES_USAGE)
> +                     return mem_cgroup_usage(memcg, true);
>               return res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, name);
>       case _KMEM:
>               return res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, name);
> @@ -4572,10 +4622,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_threshold(struct mem_cgroup 
> *memcg, bool swap)
>       if (!t)
>               goto unlock;
>  
> -     if (!swap)
> -             usage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE);
> -     else
> -             usage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
> +     usage = mem_cgroup_usage(memcg, swap);
>  
>       /*
>        * current_threshold points to threshold just below or equal to usage.
> @@ -4673,10 +4720,10 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_usage_register_event(struct 
> mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  
>       if (type == _MEM) {
>               thresholds = &memcg->thresholds;
> -             usage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE);
> +             usage = mem_cgroup_usage(memcg, false);
>       } else if (type == _MEMSWAP) {
>               thresholds = &memcg->memsw_thresholds;
> -             usage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
> +             usage = mem_cgroup_usage(memcg, true);
>       } else
>               BUG();
>  
> @@ -4762,10 +4809,10 @@ static void 
> __mem_cgroup_usage_unregister_event(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  
>       if (type == _MEM) {
>               thresholds = &memcg->thresholds;
> -             usage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE);
> +             usage = mem_cgroup_usage(memcg, false);
>       } else if (type == _MEMSWAP) {
>               thresholds = &memcg->memsw_thresholds;
> -             usage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
> +             usage = mem_cgroup_usage(memcg, true);
>       } else
>               BUG();
>  
> @@ -5525,9 +5572,9 @@ mem_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>                * core guarantees its existence.
>                */
>       } else {
> -             res_counter_init(&memcg->res, &root_mem_cgroup->res);
> -             res_counter_init(&memcg->memsw, &root_mem_cgroup->memsw);
> -             res_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, &root_mem_cgroup->kmem);
> +             res_counter_init(&memcg->res, NULL);
> +             res_counter_init(&memcg->memsw, NULL);
> +             res_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, NULL);
>               /*
>                * Deeper hierachy with use_hierarchy == false doesn't make
>                * much sense so let cgroup subsystem know about this
> @@ -5969,8 +6016,9 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_clear_mc(void)
>       /* we must fixup refcnts and charges */
>       if (mc.moved_swap) {
>               /* uncharge swap account from the old cgroup */
> -             res_counter_uncharge(&mc.from->memsw,
> -                                  PAGE_SIZE * mc.moved_swap);
> +             if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(mc.from))
> +                     res_counter_uncharge(&mc.from->memsw,
> +                                          PAGE_SIZE * mc.moved_swap);
>  
>               for (i = 0; i < mc.moved_swap; i++)
>                       css_put(&mc.from->css);
> @@ -5979,8 +6027,9 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_clear_mc(void)
>                * we charged both to->res and to->memsw, so we should
>                * uncharge to->res.
>                */
> -             res_counter_uncharge(&mc.to->res,
> -                                  PAGE_SIZE * mc.moved_swap);
> +             if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(mc.to))
> +                     res_counter_uncharge(&mc.to->res,
> +                                          PAGE_SIZE * mc.moved_swap);
>               /* we've already done css_get(mc.to) */
>               mc.moved_swap = 0;
>       }
> @@ -6345,7 +6394,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap(swp_entry_t entry)
>       rcu_read_lock();
>       memcg = mem_cgroup_lookup(id);
>       if (memcg) {
> -             res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
> +             if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> +                     res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
>               mem_cgroup_swap_statistics(memcg, false);
>               css_put(&memcg->css);
>       }
> @@ -6509,12 +6559,15 @@ static void uncharge_batch(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, 
> unsigned long pgpgout,
>  {
>       unsigned long flags;
>  
> -     if (nr_mem)
> -             res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->res, nr_mem * PAGE_SIZE);
> -     if (nr_memsw)
> -             res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, nr_memsw * PAGE_SIZE);
> -
> -     memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
> +     if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) {
> +             if (nr_mem)
> +                     res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->res,
> +                                          nr_mem * PAGE_SIZE);
> +             if (nr_memsw)
> +                     res_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw,
> +                                          nr_memsw * PAGE_SIZE);
> +             memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
> +     }
>  
>       local_irq_save(flags);
>       __this_cpu_sub(memcg->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS], nr_anon);
> -- 
> 2.0.4
> 
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to