On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 08:23, Thomas Graf wrote: > > kfree simply does nothing if it is given a null pointer so that > goto rtattr_failure for t == NULL is handled just fine without > a check. I will never get used to this behaviour and policy as > well though, it somewhat makes code less readable. >
I cant get used to it either; actually i dont think i would be able to stop my fingers ;-> > > didnt understand the janitor part. > > It will probably be removed again by one of the regular 'remove > unnecessary pre kfree checks' patchsets. > Yes, already Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has made that point - although he did not post to netdev!! ;-> So ignore my comment Herbert cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
