On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:53 AM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Sabrina Dubroca <s...@queasysnail.net> > Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 10:29:29 +0200 > >> Calling setsockopt with IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST or IPV6_LEAVE_ANYCAST >> triggers the assertion in addrconf_join_solict()/addrconf_leave_solict() >> >> ipv6_sock_ac_join(), ipv6_sock_ac_drop(), ipv6_sock_ac_close() need to >> take RTNL before calling ipv6_dev_ac_inc/dec. Same thing with >> ipv6_sock_mc_join(), ipv6_sock_mc_drop(), ipv6_sock_mc_close() before >> calling ipv6_dev_mc_inc/dec. >> >> This patch moves ASSERT_RTNL() up a level in the call stack. >> >> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <s...@queasysnail.net> >> Reported-by: Tommi Rantala <tt.rant...@gmail.com> > > Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
I believe you applied a wrong version, at least the following is not correct: + if (!dev) + return -ENODEV; Sabrina took that from my draft patch, but they all don't realize this is wrong. (I did provide a correct version which is just ignored by you.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
