Hi Mike,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:06:32AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>Hm, this patchlet seems to be having trouble taking wing.
>
>(tosses it up in the air.. flap yer little wings patchlet)
>
>I thought you had changed the title to..
>
>x86,cpu-hotplug: clear llc_shared_mask at CPU hotplug
>
>..due to Peter saying sched is only a consumer, but v4 somehow reverted
>back to being a sched patch.
>

I send out the RESEND v4 by a mistake, please refer the below link for the 
patch.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/29/159

Regards,
Wanpeng Li 

>On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 13:49 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: 
>> [  220.262245] Call Trace:
>> [  220.262252]  [<ffffffff810e8396>] load_balance+0x156/0x980
>> [  220.262259]  [<ffffffff816eeffe>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2e/0xa0
>> [  220.262266]  [<ffffffff810e9aa3>] idle_balance+0xe3/0x150
>> [  220.262270]  [<ffffffff816ec4e7>] __schedule+0x797/0x8d0
>> [  220.262277]  [<ffffffff816ec934>] schedule+0x24/0x70
>> [  220.262283]  [<ffffffff816e9cd9>] schedule_timeout+0x119/0x1f0
>> [  220.262294]  [<ffffffff810bb6e0>] ? lock_timer_base+0x70/0x70
>> [  220.262301]  [<ffffffff816e9dc9>] 
>> schedule_timeout_uninterruptible+0x19/0x20
>> [  220.262308]  [<ffffffff810bd3e8>] msleep+0x18/0x20
>> [  220.262317]  [<ffffffff813aa11a>] lock_device_hotplug_sysfs+0x2a/0x50
>> [  220.262323]  [<ffffffff813aa16e>] online_store+0x2e/0x80
>> [  220.262358]  [<ffffffff813a873b>] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x20
>> 
>> Last level cache shared map is built during cpu up and build sched domain 
>> routine takes advantage of it to setup sched domain cpu topology, however, 
>> llc shared map is unreleased during cpu disable which lead to invalid sched 
>> domain cpu topology. This patch fix it by release llc shared map correctly
>> during cpu disable.
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <[email protected]>
>> Tested-by: Linn Crosetto <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> v3 -> v4:
>>  * simplify backtrace
>> v2 -> v3:
>>  * simplify backtrace 
>> v1 -> v2:
>>  * fix subject line
>> 
>>  arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>> index 5492798..0134ec7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>> @@ -1292,6 +1292,9 @@ static void remove_siblinginfo(int cpu)
>>  
>>      for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu))
>>              cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(sibling));
>> +    for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu))
>> +            cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_llc_shared_mask(sibling));
>> +    cpumask_clear(cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu));
>>      cpumask_clear(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
>>      cpumask_clear(cpu_core_mask(cpu));
>>      c->phys_proc_id = 0;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to