Em Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 04:54:49PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@kernel.org> wrote: > > Em Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:48:20AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu: > > > It looks like I reposted older versions by mistake on 31 July. > > > Very sorry :-(
> > > The originals were changed as described here: > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140621020918615 > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140618721010170 > > No problem, the good thing is that we're almost getting it all > > in. I'll rework the branch and resubmit, Ingo, is that OK with > > you? [...] > Yeah, that's perfectly OK. > > [...] Or have you already pulled and we should instead send a > > patch on top, fixing the problem? > I pulled it locally then unpulled as it didn't pass my (very > simple) tests and it looked like there's something fishy going > on. Yeah, I should've tested this more, will make sure I test these things this time. Having a requirement that for each new feature we need an entry in 'perf test' and/or in make -C tools/perf build-test seems a bit harsh, but would be ideal, hook that to 'git request-pull' and this would hopefully only happen every celestial aligment nights or so :-\ - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
