At 2014-09-04 02:04:24, "Mike Turquette" <mturque...@linaro.org> wrote:
>Quoting Chao Xie (2014-08-25 21:38:14)
>> From: Chao Xie <chao....@marvell.com>
>> 
>> The register used by clk-frac may be shared with
>> other clocks.
>> So it needs to use spin lock to protect the register
>> access.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Xie <chao....@marvell.com>
>
>This patch will break against the latest clk-next due to api changes.
>You can see more here[0] and use this script to update your code if you
>like[1].
>
>Basically the calls to clk_set_rate need to be changed to
>clk_provider_set_rate.

>
I see the patch set [0] is V10 now, and it is not merged to clk-next yet.
So should i wait for the patch set to be merged, then send out the updated 
patches?

>[0] 
>http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1409758148-20104-1-git-send-email-tomeu.viz...@collabora.com>
>[1] 
>http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/tomeu/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-refactoring-9&id=ea48c0d655346cce26329523cf24574f9ea8feee
>
>Regards,
>Mike
N嫥叉靣笡y氊b瞂千v豝�)藓{.n�+壏{睉赙zXФ洝塄}财爖�&j:+v墾�珣赙zZ+€�+zf"穐殘啳嗃iz�畐ア�?櫒璀�&�)撷f旟^j谦y呩@A玜囤
0鹅h�鍜i

Reply via email to