On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:38:13PM +0200, Maciej Matraszek wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> thanks for your reply!
>
> > > +static int __init pm_genpd_debug_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > + struct dentry *d;
> > > +
> > > + pm_genpd_debugfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("pm_genpd", NULL);
> > > +
> > > + /* No debugfs */
> > > + if (IS_ERR(pm_genpd_debugfs_dir))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(pm_genpd_debugfs_dir);
> >
> > You shouldn't care at all, just do this check:
> >
> > > + if (!pm_genpd_debugfs_dir)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > And all will be fine, because:
> >
> > > + d = debugfs_create_file("pm_genpd_summary", S_IRUGO,
> > > + pm_genpd_debugfs_dir, NULL, &pm_genpd_summary_fops);
> >
> > That call will resolve away to nothing if debugfs is not enabled, and it
> > doesn't make much sense to do anything with an "error" of no debugfs.
>
> Great! I'll fix this bizarre double check.
>
> >
> > > + if (!d)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +late_initcall(pm_genpd_debug_init);
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG */
> >
> > No tear-down of the debugfs files on shutdown?
>
> In drivers/clk/clk.c, there is no tear-down of debugfs files paired
> with clk_debug_init(), same with wakeup_sources_debugfs_init() from
> drivers/base/power/wakeup.c. On the other hand, some subsystems
> perform it. What would you prefer?
In my quest for symmetry I prefer to see files you add to be removed at
the proper time. :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
