3.2.63-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oliver Neukum <oneu...@suse.de>

commit 5ee0f803cc3a0738a63288e4a2f453c85889fbda upstream.

Some laptops have an internal port for a BT device which picks
up noise when the kill switch is used, but not enough to trigger
printk_rlimit(). So we shouldn't log consecutive faults of this kind.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneu...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Adjust context
 - Error message already includes the port number]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -3354,6 +3354,7 @@ static void hub_port_connect_change(stru
                        le16_to_cpu(hub->descriptor->wHubCharacteristics);
        struct usb_device *udev;
        int status, i;
+       static int unreliable_port = -1;
 
        dev_dbg (hub_dev,
                "port %d, status %04x, change %04x, %s\n",
@@ -3415,10 +3416,11 @@ static void hub_port_connect_change(stru
                                USB_PORT_STAT_C_ENABLE)) {
                status = hub_port_debounce(hub, port1);
                if (status < 0) {
-                       if (printk_ratelimit())
+                       if (port1 != unreliable_port && printk_ratelimit())
                                dev_err(hub_dev, "connect-debounce failed, "
                                                "port %d disabled\n", port1);
                        portstatus &= ~USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION;
+                       unreliable_port = port1;
                } else {
                        portstatus = status;
                }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to