On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 13:40 -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> But checking skip_ioapic_setup in the non-ACPI case
> isn't quite right. This is set for "noapic". But
> it is not set in the PIC-mode case where the kernel
> supports IOAPIC but the hardware does not -- in that
> case the quirk would erroneously exit.
Ah, right, thanks. I changed it to:
if (nr_ioapics && !skip_ioapic_setup)
return;
Is that better?
> Also, the original quirk_via_irqpic()
> had a udelay(15) before the write -- I have no idea
> if that was significant or not -- maybe soembody else
> on the list does -- as none of us have VIA documentation...
Yes, I was worried about that, too. I added it back.
> ps. we need to fix this on 2.4 also.
Here's yet another iteration for 2.6. If this works OK,
I can back-port it to 2.4.
In PIC mode, some Via devices update IRQ routing when
PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE is written. So if we've updated the
device's IRQ, we also need to update PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE.
This also restores the mysterious "udelay(15)" before the
update because we don't know whether it's necessary and
haven't seen an argument for its removal.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===== arch/i386/pci/irq.c 1.55 vs edited =====
--- 1.55/arch/i386/pci/irq.c 2005-02-07 22:39:15 -07:00
+++ edited/arch/i386/pci/irq.c 2005-03-15 10:11:44 -07:00
@@ -1026,7 +1026,6 @@
static int pirq_enable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
u8 pin;
- extern int via_interrupt_line_quirk;
struct pci_dev *temp_dev;
pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, &pin);
@@ -1081,10 +1080,6 @@
printk(KERN_WARNING "PCI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin %c of
device %s.%s\n",
'A' + pin, pci_name(dev), msg);
}
- /* VIA bridges use interrupt line for apic/pci steering across
- the V-Link */
- else if (via_interrupt_line_quirk)
- pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, dev->irq & 15);
return 0;
}
===== drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c 1.37 vs edited =====
--- 1.37/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c 2005-03-01 09:57:29 -07:00
+++ edited/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c 2005-03-15 10:10:57 -07:00
@@ -388,7 +388,6 @@
u8 pin = 0;
int edge_level = ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE;
int active_high_low = ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW;
- extern int via_interrupt_line_quirk;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_pci_irq_enable");
@@ -437,9 +436,6 @@
return_VALUE(0);
}
}
-
- if (via_interrupt_line_quirk)
- pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, irq & 15);
dev->irq = acpi_register_gsi(irq, edge_level, active_high_low);
===== drivers/pci/quirks.c 1.72 vs edited =====
--- 1.72/drivers/pci/quirks.c 2005-03-10 01:38:25 -07:00
+++ edited/drivers/pci/quirks.c 2005-03-24 11:07:19 -07:00
@@ -683,19 +683,41 @@
}
DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82454NX,
quirk_disable_pxb );
-/*
- * VIA northbridges care about PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE
- */
-int via_interrupt_line_quirk;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#endif
-static void __devinit quirk_via_bridge(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+static void __devinit quirk_via_irqpic(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
- if(pdev->devfn == 0) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Via IRQ fixup\n");
- via_interrupt_line_quirk = 1;
+ u8 irq, new_irq;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
+ if (nr_ioapics && !skip_ioapic_setup)
+ return;
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+ if (acpi_irq_model != ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PIC)
+ return;
+#endif
+ /*
+ * Some Via devices make an internal connection to the PIC when the
+ * PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE register is written. If we've changed the
+ * device's IRQ, we need to update this routing.
+ *
+ * I suspect this only happens for devices on the same chip as the
+ * PIC, but I don't know how to identify those without listing them
+ * all individually, which is a maintenance problem.
+ */
+ new_irq = dev->irq & 0xf;
+ pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, &irq);
+ if (new_irq != irq) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Via PIC IRQ fixup for %s, from %d to
%d\n",
+ pci_name(dev), irq, new_irq);
+ udelay(15);
+ pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, new_irq);
}
}
-DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID,
quirk_via_bridge );
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_via_irqpic);
/*
* Serverworks CSB5 IDE does not fully support native mode
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
