Hi, On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 19:38, Chris Wright wrote:
> OK, good to know. When I last checked you were working on a higher risk > yet more complete fix, and I thought we'd wait for that one to stabilize. > Looks like the one Jan attached is the better -stable candidate? Definitely; it's the one I gave akpm. The lock reworking is going to remove one layer of locks, so it's worthwhile from that point of view; but it's longer-term, and I don't know for sure of any paths to chaos with that simpler journal_unmap_buffer() fix in place. (It's just very hard to _prove_ all cases are correct without the locking rework.) --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/