Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:22:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 24fc1024 > > > c0198448 > > > *pde = 00000000 > > > Oops: 0000 [#1] > > > CPU: 0 > > > EIP: 0060:[<c0198448>] Not tainted VLI > > > > I wonder why the EIP sometimes doesn't get decoded. > > > > > Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386 > > > EFLAGS: 00210206 (2.6.12-rc1-mm2) > > ksymoops seems to remove lines from the kernel output that it doesn't > like.
but. but. There used to be a symbol+0xN/0xM in the EIP: line. Are you saying that ksymoops rubbed that out and stuck a hex number in there? > I've seen this many times on ARM, and each time I see an oops > from a 2.6 kernel which has been ksymoopsed, I always ask the submitter > to send the original non-ksymoopsed version. > > Users need to be re-educated _not_ to use ksymoops. I wonder if there's something clever we could do to the kallsymsised oops output so that ksymoops would simply cease to recognise it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
