On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:38:41AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:36:24PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 02:30:50PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> > > This test validates what's returned by ecc_strength file in sysfs
> > > (which in turn is specified by the NAND controller when initializing
> > > the NAND chip).
> > > 
> > > Doing this should not imply knowing the ECC algorithm in use in the
> > > NAND controller or the layout used to store data on NAND.
> > the difficulty is that the ECC parity area can be not byte aligned.
> 
> Is there a problem with just rounding up to the nearest byte alignment
> and ignoring the few bits that are wasted?

I feel a little confused with the two hooks.

does the ecc->write_page_raw need to write the ECC parity data?

The page's layout after an ecc->write_page  will look like this:
                                              (Block Mark)
                                                    |      |
                                                    |  D   |
                                                    |<---->|
                                                    V      V
     +---+----------+-+----------+-+----------+-+----------+-+
     | M |   data   |E|   data   |E|   data   |E|   data   |E|
     +---+----------+-+----------+-+----------+-+----------+-+

What will the page's layout look like after the ecc->write_page_raw?


thanks
Huang Shijie

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to